|
The
Middle Kingdom
to
Senwosret III and the 12th Dynasty
Establishing
exact dates and a chronology of ancient
Egypt has been one of the most difficult tasks assumed by Egyptologists
since Manetho wrote the first modern history of the Pharonic
Era in the third century B.C.; dividing the Pharonic Era into
Kingdoms and Dynasties was his most lasting achievement. Since
Manetho, several notable historians and Egyptologists have significantly
advanced the sequence of rulers with the help of textual documentation
such as the "List of Kings" at Abydos and the "Turin
Canon" from Lahun. While the sequence of the pharaohs in
most Dynasties has come to be fairly well understood (e.g.,
Amenemhat II immediately preceded Senwosret II, who was followed
by Senwosret III), the dates associated with their reigns differ
from publication to publication. The concept of co-regencies
has added an interesting series of debates that aim to rectify
apparent overlaps in rule. This thesis will largely follow the
chronology applied in the Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (OHAE),
although some dates are adapted to reflect recent evidence.
|
|
Map of the Faiyum region with key sites (after
Grajetzki 2003, fig.2). |
|
The
Middle Kingdom (c. 2060-1650 B.C.)
consisted of three dynasties, the 11th (2060-1985), 12th (1985-1773),
and 13th (1773-1650) that generally corresponded with the rise,
renaissance, and fall of the kingdom, respectively. As a whole,
the Middle Kingdom is known for a core of political unity located
closer to the migrating border of Upper and Lower Egypt than during
previous dynasties, in the Faiyum and Lisht regions (see map).
While many of the specifics of the period remain fragmentary and
highly debated, the general historical outline is largely agreed
upon. |
Mentuhotep II
(the Egyptian Museum, Cairo) |
|
Mentuhotep
II (2055-2004) established the Middle
Kingdom when he succeeded Intef III (2063-2055) of the First Intermediate
period on the throne at Thebes. Mentuhotep's consolidation of
power, strong leadership, and re-organization of the ruling class
marked the changed from the weak and disorganized rule of Intef.
Mentuhotep, moreover, guided the state through at least 14 years
of notably violent civil wars against the noble families of a
traditional seat of power in Lower Egypt known as Herakleopolis,
a feat that none of the pharaohs of the First Intermediate Period
could accomplish. By ruling from Thebes in Upper Egypt the pharaoh
was in a better position to hold control over the troublesome
regions there that had largely contributed to the fall of the
Old Kingdom. The pharaoh created or reinstated a series of political
posts that began to centralize the power at his capital. Such
centralization of power became a constant trend throughout the
Middle Kingdom. |
The
next two pharaohs to succeed Mentuhotep
II, Mentuhotep III (2004-1992) and Mentuhotep IV (1992-1985),
were particularly vigorous in employing builders to construct
temples and, perhaps for the first time, projects of general utility
as well. During the 11th Dynasty the earliest voyages to Lebanon
and Punt were recorded, amongst other foreign centers that would
become prominent in later ancient Egypt. The circumstances of
the transition from the 11th to the 12th Dynasty, that is from
Mentuhotep IV to his vizier Amenemhat I (1985-1956), are somewhat
suspicious, although it is unlikely that overt foul-play was involved
as Amenemhat was at the fringes of the kingdom, engulfed in battle
after battle expanding the state. By most reports Amenemhat was
a faithful servant of the pharaoh who took advantage of another
person's attempted coup. Gae Callandar, a scholar of Middle Kingdom
Egypt, suggests that the lack of a viable male heir or general
weakness of the pharaoh permitted one of the high-ranking officials,
Amenemhat I, to take power. |
With
the dawn of the 12th Dynasty came
the move of the royal court and capital to Lisht in the Faiyum
region. Amenemhat I continued to actively consolidate his country’s
borders as he had done so as vizier, and usurped the power of
the nomarchs. After approximately 30 years of rule Amenemhat I
was assassinated and his son and co-regent, Senwosret I (1956-1911),
took power.
Senwosret I
continued the economic and social growth of the dynasty by expanding
southwards, sending expeditions to Asia, and for the first time
conducting frequent trade with Syria. The "royal mortuary
cult" or a supreme reverence for the pharaoh also re-emerged
under his rule, although by this time certain rituals previously
reserved for the nobility had diffused into the populace. Most
notably, Senwosret I’s rule of approximately 34 years established
a single unified material culture in ancient Egypt, intentionally
reminiscent of the Old Kingdom. The importance of a unified culture
cannot be underestimated. When the citizens of a state are allied
in their general beliefs and way of life, they are more willing
to being directed and governed. Periods of weakness during ancient
Egypt were marred by the effects of independent cultural centers
grasping for power, which usually resulted in the transition of
pharaohs and dynasties.
The
similarly long
rule of Senwosret I’s son, Amenemhat II (1911-1877), appeared
to be consistent with that of his father—though less remarkable.
The rule of Amenemhat II’s son, Senwosret II (1877-1870),
was comparatively short, probably due to his advanced age from
the two somewhat lengthy preceding reigns. Yet, these were good
years. Under Senwosret II there was a distinct lack of military
action—or perhaps only of records—permitting more
time to be spent focused on other affairs of the state including
a prolific Near Eastern trade and the institution of an irrigation
system in the Faiyum region. After Senwosret II, what has been
called the "high Middle Kingdom" (c. 1870-1777) commenced
with the reign of Senwosret III (see image of Senwosret III).
|
Senwosret I
(the Egyptian Museum, Cairo) |
|
Senwosret III
(Luxor Archaeology Museum, Egypt/
P.Creasman) |
Plan of the fortress at Semneh
(from Manual Of Egyptian Archaeology
And Guide To The Study Of Antiquities In Egypt, by
G. Maspero, 185, fig. 35)
|
|
As
the most "visible" and
perhaps most controversial pharaoh of the Middle Kingdom, many
of Senwosret III's exploits inspired the development of the Classical
Greek heroicized character "Sesostris." The adventures
of this semi-mythical person are based on the deeds of Senwosret
III, but the tales also include events that happened centuries
after the pharaoh’s death. Regardless of later developments,
Senwosret III's rule was responsible for expanding the empire
in all directions, a massive centralization of government, and
a growth in trade and technology among other major social, political,
and cultural changes.
Senwosret III,
or Khakaure, reigned for 19 to 39 years with the exact dates difficult
to establish. This was, without doubt, a very prosperous time
for Egypt. Some of the earliest records of his reign are from
his eighth year when the pharaoh had his master builder, Ronpetenenkh,
clear a canal at the First Cataract 150 cubits long by 20 cubits
wide by 15 cubits deep in order to sail his armies up the river
into Nubia. Khakaure personally led his armies to many great military
victories and most importantly secured the Nubian frontier up
to the Second Cataract. There he established two major forts,
Semneh and Kummeh, one on each side of the river. Later, the pharaoh
re-extended the limits of the empire up to the Third Cataract
at Kerma, which had been reached some 600 years prior but was
not able to be controlled. From the trading post he had set up
at Aswan and from his fort at Elephantine Island, Senwosret III
held the restless Kush people at bay and eventually became a patron
deity in Nubia, the land he had ruthlessly conquered. While most
of Senwosret’s military activity was concentrated in the
south, other monuments recorded his personal ventures east to
the Red Sea and Somaliland, north to re-open the copper mines
of Sinai, and west into the Libyan Desert. |
At
home Senwosret was continuing the
practices initiated by his predecessors to centralize the government
around his court. Although attempts were made earlier during the
Middle Kingdom to reduce the power of the nomarchs, it was this
pharaoh that was responsible for instituting the practices that
usurped their remaining power. Senwosret required the male children
of nomarchs to be educated at Lisht and then serve the state somewhere
detached from their homeland. Nearly all of the nomarchs were
personally appointed by the pharaoh and many of their traditional
titles disappeared from the archaeological record. Practices such
as those mentioned above crippled the succession of the powerful
familial nomarchs. |
Because of the influx in the population
of the capital, more positions became necessary to teach the nomarchs’
children and to keep them employed afterward. It is not surprising
that during Senwosret’s reign numerous Old Kingdom titles
were brought back and even more new titles were created. In order
to centralize and keep the powerbase of the state within his court,
Senwosret inadvertently created a bureaucracy like never seen
before, including the bureaus of Upper Egypt, Lower Egypt, treasury,
labor, military, vizier, and "bureau of the people’s
giving." Each bureau not only required a head but numerous
sub-positions, thus occupying the otherwise potentially threatening
nobles. All of these positions came with their inherent restrictions
under the watchful eyes of pharaoh and his trusted elite, but
also came with benefits. The positions expanded the middle class
as quickly as they were instituted. People other than the lavish
elite could then afford to prepare for the afterlife in a manner
similar to that of their pharaoh. The material record from Senwosret’s
reign confirms the participation of the middle class by the frequency
of less wealthy burials. Many funerary stelae describe the nature
of the deceased’s position within society and eliminate
the objectivity inherent in identifying "less wealthy"
burials.
Distinct
trends within the culture and most visibly within architecture
and funerary practices emerged based on the changing dynamics
of the society. Each scholar that has researched Senwosret III
has encountered statues and other stone likenesses of him that,
for the first time in ancient Egypt, depicted a pharaoh with non-idealized
facial features. Many of the representations of Senwosret reveal
the portrait of a worldly man, not a god-incarnate. Also under
Senwosret's reforms the middle class began to actively participate
in the "cult of Osiris" and the belief of the existence
of a "ba" or spiritual force that had formerly been
strictly reserved for the pharaohs. Although not certain, this
also appears to be the time when the mummiform coffin was introduced;
whether this was directly associated with the status of the state,
however, is not known.
|
11th-Dynasty Funerary Stela
(from www.touregypt.net)
|
Carpenter's Workshop Model. Meket-Re
Cache.
(from www.touregypt.net) |
|
Cultural
changes during the high Middle Kingdom could be due in part to
increased contact with other societies. Just as Senwosret’s
expeditions took him to the physical boundaries of his kingdom,
the same expeditions also took soldiers, viziers, nobleman, and
merchants alike. An increase in cross-cultural contact was a side
effect of Senwosret’s reign. While cultural information
was both intentionally and inadvertently traded, technological
information would have been as well. Interaction with other societies
is reflected in distinct architectural trends from the period.
Although the mud-brick pyramids of the Middle Kingdom are viewed
by some Egyptologists as inferior attempts to copy the works of
the Old Kingdom, Callandar notes that "[the Middle Kingdom]
engineers and architects reached great heights of mastery [and]
exceeded the considerable skills of their Old Kingdom counterparts."
|
Amenemhat III, at the Louvre
(from http://nefertiti.iwebland.com) |
|
Senwosret
III had only one son, Amenemhat III.
Building on the vast successes of his father, Amenemhat III reigned
for approximately 46 years, bringing peace and cultural expansion
to his land. No records of military activity during Amenemhat’s
reign are known and it is safe to assume that the active military
under his father was largely responsible for preparing the Kingdom
for a lengthy period of peace. During this time the pharaoh occupied
his people with numerous additions to temples and fortresses to
shore up their borders. He also had turquoise and copper mines
of the Sinai worked heavily. Towards the end of Amenemhat’s
reign there were several years of low floods on the Nile, which
stressed the state’s economy. The end of Amenemhat III’s
reign marked the beginning of the decline of the 12th Dynasty
and the Middle Kingdom.
Amenemhat IV,
who followed Amenemhat III, may or may not have been his son.
Regardless, the new pharaoh ruled for only nine years before his
death, in which no major events affecting the Kingdom or Dynasty
are known to have taken place. He was succeeded by Queen Sobekneferu
who may have been his sister and was probably also his wife. Her
four-year-rule seemed to be effective and legitimate, as she is
listed in the Turin Canon, but nonetheless she was the last ruler
of the 12th Dynasty. |
Aldolf Erman
writes that the kings of the 12th Dynasty raised the Kingdom to
a level of civilization never seen before and their prosperity
was so great that "it is easy to understand how the later
Egyptians looked back to it as a national classical epoch."
The opportunity to study and compare complex artifacts from the
national epoch to which Erman referred is presented in the Cairo
Dahshur boats. |
References and Citations:
The above section is excerpted from The Cairo Dahshur Boats.
MA thesis, Texas A&M University: College Station. 2005, by
Pearce Paul Creasman. The original work contains citations, not
found here, and the thesis should be consulted prior to citing
this work.
|
The contents of this site and the linked pages - text, images, and data
- are intended for personal information only. Downloading of information
or graphic images contained herein for private use is not discouraged;
however, written permission is required for the publication of any material.
For additional details, contact Pearce Paul Creasman p.creasman@tamu.edu |